UA-18677992-1

Republican Sponsored H.R. 1505 Would give DHS Police State Powers over 80% of the U.S.

By John Galt
September 30, 2011 – 21:30 ET

If you live within 100 miles of any ocean, you’re in the “zone.”

If you live within 100 miles of the United Nations in New York City, you’re in the “zone.”

If you live within 100 miles of the Canadian or Mexican border, you’re in the “zone.”

If you live within 100 miles of a foreign embassy, consulate, or declared international trade zone with foreign ownership, you’re in the “zone.”

What zone is this that I speak of?

And does an Indian Reservation border count as an “International Border?”

A zone of special security exemptions giving the United States Department of Homeland Security unlimited powers to usurp local and Federal regulations and authority to “ensure” total security and oversight of activities which may harm the United States via acts of terrorism or other means. Is this bill some radically sponsored idea from an extreme leftist wishing to spread Obama’s power base?

No.

It was sponsored and entered into the record by Republican Rob Bishop of Utah which means odds of it passing with broad support in the “cram the crap” portion of the Congressional session before Christmas are pretty high.

The Summary from the U.S. government website:

4/13/2011–Introduced.
Prohibits the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture (USDA) from taking action on public lands which impede the border security activities of the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) (Secretary). States that the Secretary shall have immediate access to any public land managed by the federal government in order to conduct activities that assist in securing the border (including access to maintain and construct roads, construct a fence, use patrol vehicles, and set up monitoring equipment). States that a specified waiver by the Secretary of certain laws regarding sections of the international border between the United States and Mexico and between the United States and Canada shall apply to all sections of the international land and maritime borders of the United States within 100 miles of such borders with respect to the Secretary’s activities under this Act.

Let that sink in. Embassies and Consulates are “foreign borders” and many International Trade Zones are considered such by law also. Then review the law in full below, look at all the acts that this seeks to usurp within the Interior Department and Department of Agriculture and start to think about the vast amount of territory this would cover. Read the act in full and think about what this could mean where a Federal police force could usurp first Federal regulations and probably due to the structure and ambiguity of this bill, state and local jurisdiction.

View this document on Scribd

Remember the key phrase of ambiguity:

“shall be considered to apply to all sections of the international land and maritime borders of the United States within 100 miles of the international land and maritime borders of the United States for the activities of the Secretary of Homeland Security described in subsection (b), including the construction of infrastructure, to achieve the operational control described in subsection (a).”

This means the entire state of Florida is subject to this law and the deliberate ambiguity of the authority(ies) granted by this proposed law essentially gives the Federal government police state rights over our entire population.

The question to be asked:

Why such a nefarious bill at this moment in history when our society is facing a financial collapse equal to or greater than 2008 and zero terrorist attacks of any substance since 2001?

Time to get on the phones and organize rapidly folks, it cleared the subcommittee in July.

Tags: , , ,

5 Responses to Republican Sponsored H.R. 1505 Would give DHS Police State Powers over 80% of the U.S.

  1. alytwo on September 30, 2011 at 21:58

    I can see the reasoning about the Mexican border but what beyond control is the reason for maritime borders? I noticed that Posey is a co signer.

    • John Galt on September 30, 2011 at 22:29

      It’s all those ChiComs canoeing over Lake Erie.

  2. Cowboy45 on October 1, 2011 at 00:10

    Either side of 100 miles of physical borders and a quick search indicates:

    ” Note: As of April 2008, there were 1,175 consulates and trade offices in 134 U.S. cities in addition to the missions listed here. The United States Department of State maintains the official consular list.[1] ”

    100 miles around 134 cities!

    None listed in BooFooville–thats a lot of unharnessed “we report only to one person” authority over a really, really lot of people.

  3. [...] Republican Sponsored H.R. 1505 Would give DHS Police State Powers over 80% of the U.S. By John Galt, September 30, 2011 – 21:30 ET [...]

  4. [...] at all within Federally owned land, which makes up a large percentage of the U.S. landmass. Republican Sponsored H.R. 1505 Would give DHS Police State Powers over 80% of the U.S. [...]

Benzinga News Feed




Translation

EnglishAfrikaansالعربيةՀայերենEuskaraБеларускаяবাংলাБългарскиCatalà中文(简体)中文(漢字)HrvatskiČeštinaDanskNederlandsSuomiFrançaisქართულიDeutschΕλληνικάગુજરાતીKreyòl ayisyenעבריתहिन्दी; हिंदीMagyarÍslenskaBahasa IndonesiaGaeilgeItaliano日本語우리말LatīnaLatviešu valodaLietuvių kalbaмакедонски јазикBahasa MelayuNorskپارسیPolskiPortuguêsRomânăРусскийCрпски језикSlovenčinaSlovenščinaEspañolKiswahiliSvenskaతెలుగుภาษาไทยTürkçeУкраїнськаTiếng Việtייִדיש
by Transposh - translation plugin for wordpress

Gold/Silver/Dollar Charts

US Market Watch

U.S. Treasuries

World Market Update

Galt Tweets

Reproduction Policy

ALL material on this website may be reproduced in full ONLY with the authorization of the owner of JohnGaltFLA.com. Links, partial reproductions with links and accreditation are acceptable. If you wish to contact the owner regarding permissions and formatting of reproductions of the works at this website send an email to:

johngaltfla@aol.com

Thank you.

JohnGaltFLA.com Privacy Policy

Information we collect and how we use it

JohnGaltFLA.com may collect the following types of information:


Information you provide – At no point in time will JohnGaltFLA.com ask for personal or private information regarding your visit to this website. Third party advertisers however may ask for this information regarding transactions initiated from links of which JohnGaltFLA.com has nor oversight nor responsibility for the information requested or how it is stored at their website. Consult your domain administrator’s privacy policy for more information.

Cookies – When you visit JohnGaltFLA.com, we send one or more cookies to your computer or other device. We use cookies to improve the quality of our service, including for storing user preferences, improving search results and ad selection, and tracking user trends, such as which articles and sections are the most popular at JohnGaltFLA.com.

Logs – When you access JohnGaltFLA.com via a browser, application or other client our servers automatically record certain information. These server logs may include information such as your web request, your interaction with a service, Internet Protocol address, browser type, browser language, the date and time of your request and one or more cookies that may uniquely identify your browser or your account.

User communications – When you send email or other communications to JohnGaltFLA.com none of the information is sold to third party affiliates or advertisers. All communications are the private information of the owner of JohnGaltFLA.com and the party which initiated the communications.

Third Party Applications – JohnGaltFLA.com may make available third party applications, such as gadgets or extensions, through this website. The information collected by JohnGaltFLA.com when you enable a third party application is processed under this Privacy Policy. Information collected by the third party application provider is governed by their privacy policies.

Other sites – This Privacy Policy applies to JohnGaltFLA.com only. JohnGaltFLA.com does not exercise control over the sites displayed as links, sites that include Google applications, products or services, or links to other websites or advertisers. These other sites may place their own cookies or other files on your computer, collect data or solicit personal information from you.