by John Galt
November 6, 2016 22:30 ET
The mainstream media, in the face of declining ratings and an angry leftist political support base, has gone 100% full INFOWARStard in their declarations as to the source of the Wikileaks information about Hillary Clinton from John Podesta and other Democratic Party leadership’s email accounts.
Sadly, many on the so-called “right” are buying this argument also.
I hate to break it to my international readers, but I’m no Vladimir Putin sycophant nor an apologist for the leftist MSM. The truth is that Russia, the KGB, nor some grand group of fat Dutch hackers who took a break from their gaming consoles have a damned thing to do with Wikileaks or Julian Assange. If anything, Assange is a dead man walking because of his status as a double agent and he knows this, because his behavior should be a reminder of the Cold War and not in a positive light. More on that later.
First and foremost, let’s address the obvious:
Who benefits from the Wikileaks against Hillary Clinton?
The obvious answer, according to conventional logic, is Cheetos Jesus, aka, Donald J. Trump.
It is also the incorrect answer. The American mainstream media has decided, upon the urging of the Obama administration to launch a modern day version of “red baiting” where every hack, every overseas incident, every terrorist act against U.S. interests, and every war had a Russian behind it. Vladimir Putin is now officially responsible for Wikileaks, hacking the State Department (which had piss electronic poor security by design to begin with), global warming, the Zika virus, and zits on Kim Kardashian’s butt which are clearly visible in unedited photos.
Putin has to be laughing his ass off at this.
The capacity of the newly reformed KGB and foreign intelligence units is quite good, however, it is not to the level of creating a false narrative in the U.S. Presidential election, filtering factual information via a third party internet gossip service via Julian Assange, and then attempting to use its wealthy to influence U.S. public opinion via quite overt propaganda means. This is a delusion created by radio talk show hosts flailing for ratings.
Now that the FBI Director Pajama Boy James Comey has dropped his investigation of the corruption within the United States State Department and Hillary Clinton, their resources can now be focused on finding a way to blame the Russians, even if they had nothing to do with it. Thus this brings the story full circle as to who benefits and who is behind the leak which has to be coming from the highest levels of a major world government.
The Background of the Power Struggle
As the President election of 2016 heated up, the campaigns leaned heavily on their most consistent and loyal insiders. This is not an illogical assumption but knowing something about the two key players in this election season provides a guide as to the how and why the Wikileaks storm of data has occurred.
First, Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s long time personal assistant and adviser is a Sunni Muslim according to multiple mainstream media sources. It is important to ignore her show marriage to Anthony Weiner and focus instead on her background without getting too deep into the mud.
The most important recent article highlighting her radical ties is indeed within a story by Paul Sperry at the NY Post where he penned the following (excerpted from August 21, 2016 article):
Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.
One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign website is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.” Her speech has emerged as a focal point of her campaign, featured prominently in last month’s Morgan Freeman-narrated convention video introducing her as the Democratic nominee.
However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-first lady Clinton.
Headlined “Women’s Rights Are Islamic Rights,” a 1996 article argues that single moms, working moms and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. It also states that more revealing dress ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” In other words, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped.
“A conjugal family established through a marriage contract between a man and a woman, and extended through procreation is the only definition of family a Muslim can accept,” the author, a Saudi official with the Muslim World League, asserted, while warning of “the dangers of alternative lifestyles.” (Abedin’s journal was founded and funded by the former head of the Muslim World League.)
“Pushing [mothers] out into the open labor market is a clear demonstration of a lack of respect of womanhood and motherhood,” it added.
Take my word for it as a former major and expert in Middle Eastern history; one does not work for a publication as Huma did unless she had deep ties to the parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood. To make matters worse, Hillary’s role in the overthrow of the Egyptian and Libyan governments to install pro-Muslim Brotherhood entities was well documented yet Huma’s ties were hidden until the election campaign began. In the end the Saudi’s failed not only to install a pro-Wahhabi government in Cairo or introduce the same in Libya, instead planting one of their radical Sunni military arms, the terrorist group ISIS, which is now battling to maintain a sliver of control inside Sirte and a few other Libyan coastal cities.
These actions not only made Huma Abedin a target of Shiite interests in the Middle East, but directly with that of a Shia buried within the Obama administration.
That brings us to the second individual, the one person I believe is responsible for all of the data and who has ACCESS to all of these emails and more.
The deal struck with Iran to ship them billions of dollars, Euros, and whatever in paper currency did not happen by accident. The willingness to betray the Saudi, Qatar, and Israeli government to allow Iran to build nuclear reactors and develop a viable nuclear weapons program was not just another isolated incident. The ability to install pro-Saudi Muslim Brotherhood individuals inside the United States Department of State and Central Intelligence Agency, also, not an accident.
Interestingly, the Republicans by and large have stayed silent which begs the question:
How much did they profit from turning a blind eye?
But instead, I should re-focus on the main issue as there is a mole inside the administration who is diametrically opposed to Hillary Clinton on not just personal, but religious reasons and not for the other reasons one might think.
The bleeding started with Wikileaks dumping large swaths of data on the internet from the Democrat National Committee (DNC) and the personal emails of one John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. Many of the initial leaks were innocuous enough; individuals needing background information, meeting set ups, interview arrangements, and press overviews. All of this made the emails validity seem real and the lack of consternation and screaming from the DNC and Podesta himself seemed to confirm their authenticity.
This failure to kill the leaks and deny their validity may or may not cost Hillary Clinton the election on Tuesday, but it will have accomplished the goal of the mole.
Throughout this entire episode the one running theme of the emails and their subject matter which seemed to worsen by the day maintained a running theme:
Hillary Rodham Clinton is the most corrupt, despicable, evil person to ever run for President of the United States.
Thus backtracking using conventional thinking, if Donald Trump is not the primary beneficiary who is?
Yeah, this guy:
So does this mean Obama is the source of the Wikileaks?
Of course not. He is having the time of his life playing golf nationwide, hanging with sports stars, watching obnoxious rappers performing concerts for Hillary, and soaking in the adulation for his wonderfulness.
This gives Obama plausible deniability while his “legacy” is secured. He is able to say that it is Putin and the Russians with some degree of credibility because after all he is the President and why would he lie about something which appears obvious to most? This moves the source inside the White House, someone who wants to project a degree of legacy management where Obama appears to the American people as the first “great” Black American President. It also means that there is someone who wants to humiliate Hillary Clinton and her minions within the DNC pointing out that they are a bunch of lying, corrupt, evil individuals who once dared to impede the coronation of Obama and ascent to power.
And of course, if one could perform this act of humiliation and at the same time getting revenge on the one Sunni adversary where it got personal while destroying what little credibility the Saudi Arabian/Gulf Cooperation Council cartel had in Washington, D.C. to help a government in Tehran one was loyal to, THIS would be called a “Game of Thrones” win. Now that Huma Abedin has the viability of camel dung in the desert, John Podesta outed as a racial bigot with anti-minority leanings, and the Saudi/Qatar cartel highlighted as renting the Clintons like they are a Las Vegas street whore it means that they have zero credibility left in D.C. nor can they really perform in any capacity within a Hillary Clinton administration.
To add to the humiliation, even though the FBI cleared Hillary to some degree, no official proclamation about Huma Abedin has been made nor announced by the Department of Justice or F.B.I.
With all of that background, let me introduce you to the individual I believe is the mole in the White House supplying the information to Wikileaks. This person gets to perform an act of revenge against her opposite within the Hillary Clinton power structure, preserve Obama’s legacy, and of course, guarantee a healthy financial future as one of the dirtiest players in the political game. Meet the alleged Shiite insider who wants to humiliate and destroy the Sunni while expanding Iran’s power in the world:
Valerie Jarrett has everything to gain, nothing to lose. If caught, she is pardoned before Obama leaves office. If successful, which it appears she will be with a Democrat win and possible takeover of the Senate, Obama’s legacy and legislative accomplishments are preserved. Iran is on the fast track to replacing Saudi Arabia as the regional superpower, global Sunni terrorism will remain the bogeyman, and Hillary Clinton will have been forced into a corner to deal with Vladimir Putin after supporting Obama’s military buildup towards war in Europe. Remember; she has the religious motive, the access to NSA and CIA resources as White House Chief of Staff, and most of all the political and financial motivation to destroy most of Hillary’s reputation and support staff.
In all, the theory is sound; make the American people pine for the “good old days” under Obama, wish that there was no perpetual state of war or conflict, and in the end, leave the nation in chaos while destroying both political parties to allow the further degradation of our society as the Marxists of Obama’s era desired.
I should know.
I was one while in college.
It was the plan, all along; to seize leadership positions and sow destruction.
I’m just shocked America fell for it. Too bad there is no recovery from where we will fall in the end.