by John Galt
June 11, 2012 23:30 ET
There is this early optimism among the Republicans of this Republic along with the utter disdain and disgust from independents that President Barrack Obama will be departing the White House after the upcoming election. The problem with this line of thinking is that this is no ordinary administration. Obama’s regime was not designed by the typical Democratic Party operatives nor the usual liberal suspects. America was under assault back in the 1980′s the minute Ronald Reagan won the presidency and unfortunately, President Obama is simply the result of the revenge the Marxist extremists had been planning for during the last thirty plus years.
The question then becomes quite simple:
What if Mitt Romney wins the election but loses a nation?
How could such a tragedy occur? To start one simply has to review the psyche and composition of those individuals that Obama represented not as an elected official, but as a representative of the extremists of his collegiate era. The “fundamental transformation” of the United States is what this campaign was always about and to his credit and our nation’s detriment, he has succeeded beyond his wildest dream. But the question begs itself as Barrack Obama apparently grew up with the behavior that most people would associate with that of a sore loser. Thus if he were to be defeated in the November election, a various number of options are available to him as President which could sabotage at least the first two years of a Romney administration, if not the nation permanently.
Obama has a variety of what I call “nuclear options” to inflict upon his successor, all of which have drastic impacts on our nation which I have summed up in these three horrific possibilities:
1. If Iran fails to cooperate with the United States and Western powers as will be determined in all likelihood by the end of this summer, then the decision to either turn a blind eye while Israel eradicates the Iranian nuclear program threat falls to the White House. Of course, if the polls indicate a massive election defeat, it is not beyond the ethics of this administration to launch either a pre-election strike with or without Israel or worse, a post election attack on the Iranian sites. The pre-election strike option would be rightfully perceived as an attempt to bolster Obama’s sagging poll numbers in a desperate attempt to win the election. The post election attack while more logical would have dire implications for the incoming Romney administration.
If and when any attack occurs, the economic fallout would be immediate, sharp, and destructive to Western economies almost immediately. The rise in oil prices would cripple the American economy within weeks. The threat of terrorists conducting vengeance operations inside Europe and the U.S. will certainly add to the uncertainty in the economy and cause a rapid decline in retail sales; right as the Christmas shopping season begins. President Romney would walk into office with an immediate recession and potential of inheriting a near if not total police state depending on the efficiency of the terrorists and their activities domestically.
2. The early prognosticators are warning that the Taxmaggedon which is approaching at the end of 2012 could well be punted with the lame duck session of Congress passing a stop gap measure to push the decision on the Bush tax cuts and other tax issues into the spring. This might work considering the cowardly leadership on both sides of the aisle but the missing part of the formula is sitting at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Consider the strong possibility that the Obamacare decision is against the administration and President Obama is sitting in the White House with nothing to lose in late December. Add in the factor that his keynote “historic” footprint he had counted on was now voided and the Republicans will be the focus of his wrath. A simple veto on any measure taken to address this issue dumps the problem squarely on President Romney and with a less than 2/3 majority in the Senate, legislative paralysis would ensue.
As would a major recession as American business comes to a screeching halt due to the massive tax increases imposed on investment and income.
3. The power of the pen has long been recognized by most progressive Presidents since Theodore Roosevelt, but Obama’s model was Franklin Delano Roosevelt. That would seem to cheer most average citizens as FDR has been portrayed as a hero, saving America from the Great Depression and Nazi Germany. The truth is far more chilling once one peels the liberal propaganda off the veneer and that alone should alert any sane person as to the potential of an Obama signing spree in late December of this year while American citizens celebrate the holidays.
Consider the information that nationally syndicated talk show hosts like Glenn Beck have revealed with their research on the Tides Foundation, George Soros, and other extremist organizations that have helped draft the new regulatory and legislative programs initiated by the Obama administration. Despite some reports on the internet, Obama has been selective with his issuing of Executive Orders but the types of orders he has signed into law have impaired economic and constitutional freedoms in several cases. With the Republican lead House of Representatives acting like a bunch of scared school girls, unwilling to cut funding or confront the regime on these excessive abuses of power, it has only emboldened the administration to act even more boldly, yet what happens when he has nothing to lose?
It is my contention that there are a set of “nuclear option” Executive Orders being developed if not already on file to be signed into law if he loses. Thus far he has only signed 127 since coming into office (Source: National Archives). What would stop him from issuing 100 in 10 days? Nothing. And the actions taken by his cabinet and regulatory structure with tens of thousands of predetermined regulations designed by Cass Sunstein could paralyze the economy and tie the Romney regime up for months if not years reversing his actions.
Lastly, the power of the pen he could exercise with pardons for his leftist friends and convicted terrorists of the ilk like the Black Panthers and Bill Ayers type would trigger a shudder of fear throughout the sane souls of the nation as these animals are released on an unsuspecting public.
Before anyone dismisses this as the rantings of a “vast right wing conspiracy blogger” one must remember I am neither huge into conspiracies nor one who associates strongly with the Republican Party elites. I prefer to analyze things from a historical perspective and considering the track record of Barrack Obama and some of his vices such as vanity and arrogance, it is only logical that the extreme left would engage in a scorched earth policy if they lose the election. Regardless of what occurs in the months ahead regarding domestic or foreign policy and the elections in November, the biggest losers will not be a future President Romney but the American people.
None of this is too far out there to consider. I’ve been having a lot of discussions with my fellow LEO’s still on duty about what would happen if the “wrong guy wins”. If anything, your predictions are less dire than what we expect, which would be the possibility that Obama uses the Bush Executive emergency order to not give up the office after a false flag event at the eleventh hour, or between November and December should he lose the election. While we tend to be a pessimistic bunch given our jobs we are also realists and if people think “it couldn’t happen here” because it hasn’t yet, then people are just fooling themselves. We don’t have any special dispensation – and if we did before after what has been systematically been done to the laws, social structure, and economy of this country recently then it’s only a matter of “when”, not “if”.